The London market
Two markets, one job title
What London startups are actually paying engineers in 2026. The honest answer is now: it depends which market you are in.
The split, in one paragraph
If the market feels confusing right now, it is because you are looking at two markets wearing one job title.
One is frozen. Across UK tech the median engineering salary moved 0.24 per cent in the six months to April, which is statistically nothing. The other is running hot: AI role pay moved roughly twelve times faster over the same window, US labs are advertising London engineering roles with £225,000 salary floors, and three quarters of all UK venture money in the first half of 2026 went to AI companies.
You can see the split in whichever dataset you pick up. Payroll data says the median mid-level engineer in London earns about £72,000, up barely 2 per cent on the year. Advertised salaries for London software engineers actually fell 9 per cent this year, after rising 13 per cent the year before. Meanwhile AI and ML hiring is up 88 per cent year on year, and those roles carry a 12 per cent like-for-like premium on verified payroll.
Both stories are true at once. Which is why one engineer is fielding three recruiter messages a day while a friend with a near-identical CV is sending applications into a void alongside eight hundred other people. Neither of them is imagining it.
King's Cross became a gravity well
The single biggest change this year is not a number, it is a postcode. In April, Anthropic signed for a new King's Cross office with room for 800 people. OpenAI answered with an 88,500 square foot lease nearby, its largest research hub outside the US. Around 900 net-new engineering and research seats between them, on the same few blocks as DeepMind, Meta and Wayve.
The prices are not local prices. Every engineering role Anthropic has listed in London carries a base of at least £225,000, and the top of its ranges runs past £600,000. The door swings one way, too: lab retention is unusually high, running around 80 per cent at two years.
To be clear about scale. The labs will hire perhaps a thousand people. London has tens of thousands of engineers, and almost nobody reading this will work at one. But ceilings do something to everything under them. The startup that used to lose its best senior engineer to a £150,000 fintech offer now loses them to £250,000 and up, and every band beneath stretches to cover the gap.
Observed clearing prices
These are base salaries at which offers were actually accepted or lost. London, seed to Series B, mid-2025 through mid-2026. All figures plus equity.
| Level | Clears at | Outliers | What the benchmarks say |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product engineer 2 to 4 years |
£95k to £120k | £140k | Advertised London median reached £100k this summer, 90th percentile £130k. Payroll median for the same profile is about £72k. That spread is the whole story. |
| Senior 5 to 10+ years |
£120k to £155k | £175k | Payroll median at Series A or B is £112k, but that describes everyone who is not moving. levels.fyi London senior runs to about £175k total comp, which is where our outliers sit. |
| Staff | £135k to £170k | £200k | Published London staff and principal guides say £110k to £165k. The levels.fyi 90th percentile sits around £200k total comp. AI-native companies clear the guides routinely. |
| With production LLM work | +12% | and rising | Payroll-verified like-for-like premium. Advertised measures run higher, and the buyer pool changes entirely. |
One thing that has not changed: advertised bands still understate the top. Across our client base, the gap between the job description range and the number quoted on real calls runs £20,000 to £30,000. Everyone's band is still fiction at the top end.
For the product engineer level specifically, including where deals die and what the offer mechanics look like, see what a product engineer earns in London.
Teams got smaller, more senior, and better paid
The other quiet shift is that startups simply employ fewer engineers than they used to, and pay each one more. Seed-stage startups now average 5.3 people, down from 6.9 two years ago. AI-native startups run about 25 per cent leaner at the same valuation, and within that smaller team they carry 13 per cent more engineers, fewer managers, and noticeably fewer juniors.
At 5.3 people, your next engineer is a fifth of the company. Leaner teams price every hire like it matters, because it does.
The junior market
The junior numbers are brutal. In 2023, tech companies hired roughly three in ten new graduates. Last year it was one in ten. UK graduate vacancies fell by more than a third in twelve months.
If you are mid-level or senior, this is the scarcity underneath your leverage: the industry stopped minting people like you, then converged on hiring exactly you. It also explains a strange feature of 2026. Engineering attrition is at historic lows, around 9 per cent, so fewer people are testing the market at precisely the moment the market pays most for the ones who do.
If you are junior: this market is the hardest in a decade and it is not a verdict on you. The way in is proof, shipped and public and real, plus smaller companies, plus any door that opens. I would love to tell you recruiters have a fix. We do not. What I can tell you is that companies which stopped hiring juniors are quietly manufacturing a senior shortage for around 2029, and the market will re-learn the lesson the expensive way.
Equity: the rules moved in your favour in April
The most under-reported comp news of the year is a tax change. From April 2026 the UK dramatically expanded EMI, the tax-advantaged option scheme most startup engineers are granted under.
| Limit | Before | Now |
|---|---|---|
| Company size limit | 250 employees | 500 employees |
| Gross assets ceiling | £30M | £120M |
| Company-wide option cap | £3M | £6M |
| Option life | 10 years | 15 years |
In plain terms, scaleups that had outgrown EMI, roughly Series B and beyond, can grant it again. If a company told you in 2025 that it was too big for EMI so your options would be unapproved, that is mostly no longer true, and it is worth re-asking.
The tax logic underneath got stronger, not weaker. Between £100,000 and £125,000 the effective marginal rate is still 62 per cent, the thresholds are frozen until at least 2031, and over two million people will cross the £100,000 line this tax year. £10,000 of base in that band is £3,800 in your account. The same value moved into options, pension or an extended exercise window is worth materially more.
What to do about it
If you are an engineer
- Work out which market you are in before you negotiate. Payroll medians describe people who already have jobs. Advertised bands describe what companies wish they could pay. The clearing prices above describe what profiles like yours actually closed at.
- The AI premium follows proof, not titles. Hiring managers report a wave of CVs rebadged "Senior AI Engineer" and filter them out in one interview. What moves you across the line is production LLM work: shipped, measured, in front of users.
- Above £100,000, negotiate structure rather than the number. The 62 per cent band means base is the least efficient thing you can win.
- Assume the counter, then discount it. Counters still arrive within the week, and the data still says roughly half the people who accept one are back on the market within months. I used to think that stat was recruiter folklore too. It keeps being true.
- Low attrition cuts both ways. Almost nobody is moving, which means when you do test the market you are competing with fewer people than the vibes suggest.
If you are hiring
- Benchmark against who you are actually bidding against: funded, AI-adjacent startups, with the labs' shadow over your senior band.
- The EMI expansion is the cheapest lever you were handed this year. If you are near Series B and wrote off EMI on headcount or assets, re-check your eligibility before your next offer goes out.
- Price every hire like it matters. At 5.3 people, it does.
Common questions
What is the average software engineer salary in London in 2026?
There is no single useful average, because London contains three markets. About £72,000 is the payroll median for a mid-level engineer already in a job. The advertised median reached £100,000 this summer, with a 90th percentile of £130,000. The AI labs start at £225,000. Same job title, three different markets.
Why does the market feel booming and frozen at the same time?
Because it is both. The median moved 0.24 per cent in six months while AI pay moved about twelve times faster. Advertised salaries for London software engineers fell 9 per cent this year, while AI and ML hiring rose 88 per cent. Which market you are in decides which of those you experience.
What changed with EMI options in April 2026?
The company size limit doubled to 500 employees, the gross assets ceiling quadrupled to £120 million, the company-wide cap doubled to £6 million, and option life went from 10 to 15 years. Scaleups that had outgrown EMI can grant it again, so it is worth re-asking if you were told otherwise in 2025.
Is it worth moving right now?
Engineering attrition is around 9 per cent, historically low. Fewer people are testing the market at exactly the moment the market pays most for the ones who do. That is leverage, if your profile sits in the half that is running hot.
Where does this data come from?
Two places. First, offers and placements Ethiq worked on between mid-2025 and mid-2026: real offers from seed to Series B startups in London, anonymised, including the ones we lost. Second, published benchmark data from Ravio and Figures for payroll, ITJobsWatch and Indeed Hiring Lab for advertised salaries, levels.fyi and Wellfound for candidate-reported figures, Carta, Index Ventures and SeedLegals for equity, Dealroom and HSBC Innovation Banking for funding, plus market reporting from Sifted, SignalFire and The Pragmatic Engineer.
Where the sources disagree, I have said which I believe. The full report, including a PDF version, lives on Ethiq's site.
Nothing here is a job ad. Questions about the data: james@ethiqrec.com.